May 15, 2011 Hit and Run?

May 15th, 2011

This story is a terrible tragedy. A three year old boy was hit by a car and killed. It is a terrible thing to happen and it must have been horrible for his family and for the driver of the car, too. However, the reporting on this story has been awful. There has been very little reporting of facts and a lot of sensationalism and a rush to judgement against the driver. Reported as a “hit and run” accident, the 19 year old driver actually did stop and the passenger got out to try to aid the child that got hit. The driver ran away on foot and  he claims he “feared for his life.” A lot of questions remain unanswered.

Was the driver speeding? Was he driving carelessly or recklessly? Why was the four year old playing in the street? One version stated that he was crossing the street, another that he was playing in the street, and the latest that he was playing near the street and ran out in front of the car. With all this boy’s family around, who was watching him?

Now, the story is that the driver and his passenger were driving in park looking for a place to get stoned. And the boy ran out in front of the car and he had no chance to stop. In fact, the family got so agitated when the driver was brought into court that the court had to be cleared. It does seem likely that he was afraid for his life at the scene. This story is awful and nobody seems to be in the right. A three year old is dead and a 19 year old is going to wind up in jail for a very long time.

May 15, 2011 Shelton Prom Fiasco

May 15th, 2011

I know this one has been done to death and it really is trivial, but I feel compelled to weigh in on this one, too. This points out the total folly of “Zero Tolerance” policies. There was no malicious intent on the part of this young man and why the school principal feels it necessary to draw this line in the sand is beyond me. “Zero tolerance” sounds far to much like “I was just following orders”. The principal of this school is being well paid, and it should be for being able to exercise her judgement, not to blindly follow “policy”.

June 21, 2010 Health Care ‘Reform’

June 22nd, 2010

There was an article today in the New York Times with the headline “As Law Takes Effect, Obama Gives Insurers a Warning”, written by Kevin Sack and Sheryl Gay Stolberg. This article is bad news and a prime example of what is wrong with politicizing health care (or any other area of the economy, for that matter.)

As Mr. Obama’s health insurance reform law draw near, he is already warning insurers to not hike premiums in advance of closer government scrutiny of health insurance premium rates. If Mr. Obama forces health insurers to cover more and at the same time limits premium increases, then he is asking them to pay more cash and take in less cash. Eventually, he will drive them out of business. But long before they go out of business due to loss of income, the loss of profits will force investors, the people who buy stocks and bonds, to look elsewhere for reasonable returns on their savings, on their investment dollars. Put simply, if an investor or fund advisor has a pile of money to invest and insurance companies can’t pay the going rate, the investor will find other investments that will. Money will flow out of the insurance companies that we depend on for our health care coverage! This will force a crisis and in the end, a government take over of the health care industry.

So-called universal health care is a lie. No nation that has tried it has prospered and improved health care over the long run. Short term improvements may sometimes and in some places occur, but they do at the expense of drawing down existing capital. When that runs out, health care goes into a long, slow decline. No third party payer thinks your health is as important as you think it is. They simply aren’t going to value your care the same way you do and will not pay what you would be willing to pay. If you have paid into their system all your life, they will be slow to pay it back and you will not have any real say in your own care. The insurance company or the government will claim other obligations that take precedence and that they simply can’t afford your care, certainly not if they had to give that level of care to ‘everybody.’

True health care reform means putting the health care consumer back in the driver’s seat. That will only happen if the consumer is the one paying the bills. There should be a combination of health savings accounts, including terminal care savings, and patient bought health insurance and health care, all together and all bought and paid for by the people receiving the care. If a government safety net is felt necessary, it should be for the poorest and most desperate and should be considered a temporary safety net until the recipient can get back on their feet.

My View!

February 15th, 2010

This is just a place holder until I get down to serious blogging about the things I read in the news. I am writing primarily from a libertarian point of view. I strongly believe in free minds, free markets and free people. I am a firm believer in the principles of the American Revolution and I want to see them furthered and strengthened. Sadly, today I see a tendency to back slide into socialism and a hierarchical society. I believe this is mostly from ignorance or fear and I intend to write to address both of these issues.